Roman Tyczka w wfgsvtz2jjvg.dlg@tyczka.com">news:wfgsvtz2jjvg.dlg@tyczka.com
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:09:05 +0200, 1634Racine wrote:
Bowiem chodzi o to, dlaczego *na* *stale* , *niezmiennie* , xp widzi
tylko 2.66 giga.
A wajchę 3GB przestawił?
http://dwf.blogs.com/beyond_the_paper/2009/04/enabling-3gb-switch-on-windo
ws-vista.html
dopytam:
i wszyscy, majac xp, i ok 4 giga ram-u teoret. widzialne, bawia sie wlasnie
w taka partyzantke, by spod ppm w "moj komputer" widziec *zawsze* cos
bardziej optymistycznego niz (jak w moim przypadku) tylko 2.66 giga? to
jest zabieg powszechny?
btw:
The author is correct in stating that this switch effects the virtual
address space. But the most recent comment is wrong, this switch has nothing
to do with how RAM is utilized. Even without this switch a system will be
able to make full use of 3GB or even more RAM, if it can be provided. This
setting only effects the normal division of virtual address space which is
totally independent of how RAM is utilized.The setting has a downside and
should only be used when an important application requires or will benefit
from the larger virtual address space. It restricts the system cache which
will have a negative influence on system performance. There are other issues
as well.
Larry Miller
Microsoft MCSA
|