Autor: balth (balth_at_interia.pl)
Data: Thu 11 Oct 2001 - 23:18:21 MET DST
> > juz to czytalem ale czemu 1800 a nie 2000 ? przecie podobne a nawet
lepesze
> > sa xp :) os p4 2.0
>
> Bo te oznaczenia nie są względem P4, a starego Athlona. Athlon XP 1800+
> ma po prostu wydajność odpowiadającą Athlonowi C 1800 MHz :)) A że oba
> takie procesory byłyby w niektórych zastosowaniach szybsze od P4 2000...
Z http://athlonxp.amd.com/faq/ :
Q2 What do the 1800+, 1700+, 1600+, and 1500+ numbers mean?
A2 These are model numbers. AMD will identify the AMD Athlon XP
processor using model numbers, as opposed to megahertz, and is introducing
1800+, 1700+, 1600+ and 1500+ versions. Model numbers are designed to
communicate the relative application performance among the various AMD
Athlon XP processors, as well as communicate the architectural superiority
over existing AMD Athlon processors. The AMD Athlon XP processor 1800+ will
outperform an Intel PentiumR 4 processor
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
operating at 1.8GHz on a broad array of end-user applications.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
a.. AMD Athlon XP processor 1800+ operates at a frequency of
1.533GHz.
b.. AMD Athlon XP processor 1700+ operates at a frequency of
1.47GHz.
c.. AMD Athlon XP processor 1600+ operates at a frequency of
1.40GHz.
d.. AMD Athlon XP processor 1500+ operates at a frequency of
1.33GHz.
No więc chyba niekoniecznie z tymi starymi athlonami...
bye
balth
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue 18 May 2004 - 23:05:15 MET DST