Autor: RafiK (rafik_at_REMOVE.goldenlan.net)
Data: Tue 23 Mar 2004 - 13:16:11 MET
Użytkownik ajax napisał:
> rg wrote:
>
> jeśli 6000 ping jest normalny w tej sieci to chyba jednak zamówię neo
Jak już było w tym wątku, nie w każdej spółce TeleNetu jest tak źle. Ja
na zwykłym modemie 56 kb (Telefony Brzeskie) mam:
PING onet.pl (213.180.130.200): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=0 ttl=56 time=116.0 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=120.2 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=120.2 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=120.1 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=120.2 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=120.2 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.130.200: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=130.2 ms
--- onet.pl ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 116.0/122.1/130.2 ms
PING www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=0 ttl=119 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=150.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=119 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=3 ttl=119 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=4 ttl=119 time=161.9 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=5 ttl=119 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=6 ttl=119 time=130.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.77.100.101: icmp_seq=7 ttl=119 time=150.1 ms
--- www.wp.pl ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 130.2/139.1/161.9 ms
-- RafiK
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed 19 May 2004 - 18:15:54 MET DST