Autor: ajax (ajax_at_adress.inv)
Data: Mon 22 Mar 2004 - 23:11:18 MET
Tak na deser - kilka przykładów :
PING wp.pl (212.77.100.101) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): icmp_seq=1 ttl=120 time=6010 ms
64 bytes from www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): icmp_seq=2 ttl=120 time=6109 ms
64 bytes from www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): icmp_seq=3 ttl=120 time=6935 ms
64 bytes from www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): icmp_seq=7 ttl=120 time=8222 ms
64 bytes from www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): icmp_seq=8 ttl=120 time=7237 ms
64 bytes from www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): icmp_seq=9 ttl=120 time=6243 ms
64 bytes from www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): icmp_seq=10 ttl=120 time=6329 ms
--- wp.pl ping statistics ---
16 packets transmitted, 7 received, 56% packet loss, time 14999ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6010.252/6726.959/8222.919/739.615 ms, pipe 9
PING onet.pl (213.180.130.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from f1virt.onet.pl (213.180.130.200): icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=8111
ms
64 bytes from f1virt.onet.pl (213.180.130.200): icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=6129
ms
64 bytes from f1virt.onet.pl (213.180.130.200): icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=5802
ms
64 bytes from f1virt.onet.pl (213.180.130.200): icmp_seq=7 ttl=54 time=5780
ms
64 bytes from f1virt.onet.pl (213.180.130.200): icmp_seq=8 ttl=54 time=5843
ms
64 bytes from f1virt.onet.pl (213.180.130.200): icmp_seq=9 ttl=54 time=5883
ms
--- onet.pl ping statistics ---
16 packets transmitted, 6 received, 62% packet loss, time 15128ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5780.346/6258.622/8111.606/836.619 ms, pipe 9
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed 19 May 2004 - 18:15:53 MET DST