Autor: Szymon Sokol (szymon_at_uci.agh.edu.pl)
Data: Sat 12 Jun 1999 - 16:11:52 MET DST
Adam Nojszewski <adam_at_nojszewski.priv.pl> wrote:
: Moze by tak wprowadzic obowiazek posiadania przez providera (typu onet,
: polbox, tpsa itp) adresu abuse? To by znacznie uproscilo sprawe. (moze
: takie adresy ma kazdy, a ja poprostu nie wiem)
W RFC 822 jest napisane:
This standard specifies a single, reserved mailbox address
(local-part) which is to be valid at each site. Mail sent to
that address is to be routed to a person responsible for the
site's mail system or to a person with responsibility for
general site operation. The name of the reserved local-part
address is: Postmaster so that "Postmaster_at_domain" is
required to be valid.
To chyba najbliższe "obowiązku" co może być. Chcesz napisać RFC
domagające się, żeby "abuse_at_domain" też było "required to be valid"?
-- Szymon Sokol (SS316-RIPE, SS4004) -- Network Manager B Computer Center, University of Mining and Metallurgy, Cracow, Poland. O http://2510053385/~szymon/ PGP key id: 2.x: 0x61094A7D, 5.x: 0xF9289982 F Free speech includes the right not to listen, if not interested - RAHeinlein H
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed 19 May 2004 - 16:22:16 MET DST