Autor: Marek Pokulniewicz (mpokul_at_sejm.gov.pl)
Data: Wed 30 Oct 1996 - 11:18:48 MET
Czesc,
Mam takie polaczenie z icm.edu.pl:
traceroute to www.icm.edu.pl (148.81.209.4), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 193.59.105.97 (193.59.105.97) 1.387 ms 1.243 ms 1.159 ms
2 brama.sejm.gov.pl (193.59.104.89) 1.265 ms 1.202 ms 1.115 ms
3 148.81.254.169 (148.81.254.169) 4.561 ms 4.462 ms 4.423 ms
4 Ochota-r1.warman.org.pl (148.81.165.6) 383.387 ms 424.14 ms 440.748
ms
5 SunSITE.icm.edu.pl (148.81.209.3) 443.519 ms * 448.93 ms
Czyli nieduzo routerow "po drodze".
I dalej:
PING www.icm.edu.pl (148.81.209.4): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=0 ttl=249 time=311.0 ms
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=0 ttl=249 time=313.9 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=249 time=390.9 ms
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=249 time=393.9 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=249 time=382.4 ms
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=249 time=385.4 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=3 ttl=249 time=475.9 ms
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=3 ttl=249 time=487.2 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=4 ttl=249 time=387.6 ms
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=4 ttl=249 time=398.9 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=6 ttl=249 time=374.5 ms
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=6 ttl=249 time=409.3 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=7 ttl=249 time=244.9 ms
64 bytes from 148.81.209.4: icmp_seq=7 ttl=249 time=256.2 ms (DUP!)
Co naturalnie nie powoduje ze pakiety nie gina.
Jak na ATM i 100MHz to raczej slabo to idzie.
Marek Pokulniewicz
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed 19 May 2004 - 16:00:22 MET DST