Autor: fachman (fachman_at_friko.onet.pl)
Data: Wed 21 Oct 1998 - 22:51:35 MET DST
>Prawdę mówiąc, nie są to wyniki zadziwiająco wysokie. Szczególnie
>koprocesor, który wypada w Celeronie gorzej, niż by to wynikało
>z przewagi w FPU nad AMD i z większej częstotliwości pracy układu.
To nic nadzwyczajnego K6 dobrze wypada przy nisko poziomowych testach
koprocesora gorzej jezeli sa to bardziej skomplikowane przeliczenia glownie
dzieki brakowi zaimplementowanej superpotokowosci. Podobno nowy K6-2 450
bedzie to mial. W kazdym razie popatrz na symulacje aplikacji Floating point
i bedziesz widzial przewage ;)
Bylem dzisiaj u kumpla i testowalem na jego K6-2 315MHz FIC MVP3.
W speedrate okazal sie szybszy (troszke) od mojego celerka a to wyniki
Wintune98
Summary
AMD K6-2 with MultiMedia Extensions
(1) 315 MHz
Windows 98 4.10.1998
Trident 3DImage 9750 (PCI/AGP v4457a)
640x480_at_16bits/pixel
792?0,075(0,0094%) MIPS (Integer operations)
373?0,58(0,16%) MFLOPS (Floating point operations)
72?0,077(0,11%) (Integer application simulation)
40?0,12(0,3%) (Floating point application simulation)
70?0,061(0,087%) (MMX application simulation)
39?3,7(9,4%) Video MPixels/s
7,7?0,03(0,39%) OpenGL MPixels/s
50?0,16(0,32%) Direct3D MPixels/s
519?3,5(0,67%) RAM MB/s
51?0,3(0,6%) cached disk MB/s
1,9?0,008(0,43%) uncached disk MB/s
System Details
BIOS: Award 07/20/98
Bus: PCI,ISA
APM: Version 1.2 Flags 0x7
Possible 'hog' apps running:
Other apps running: Test results report; DDHelpWndClass; AVP Monitor;
QuickRes; Norton SpeedStart; SRS; Power Meter; MS_WebcheckMonitor
CPU Details
CPU load: 1
low MIPS: -1
CPUID: 0x0580 0x8001BF
dhrystone time (s): 2,5
whetstone time (s): 0,027
Integer time (s): 5,4
Floating point time (s): 8,9
MMX time (s): 6,7
Video Details
AccOpt: Normal
Total video time (s): 5,9
Window open time (s): 0,032
Text scroll time (s): 0,55
Line drawing time (s): 1,9
Filled objects time (s): 0,6
Pattern blit time (s): 0,45
Text draw time (s): 0,47
DIB blit time (s): 1,9
Window close time (s): 0,027
OpenGL Details
Time (s): 11
Direct3D Details
DirectX Version 600
Time (s): 2,5
Memory Details
Memory Read Speed (MB/s): 644
Memory Write Speed (MB/s): 637
Memory Copy Speed (MB/s): 276
Installed RAM (MB): 64
Free RAM (MB): 32
Memory used (%): 35
Page File Driver: 32-bit
Total Page File (MB): 77
Free Page File (MB): 60
Read speed, 4 KB blocks, MB/s: 1184
Read speed, 8 KB blocks, MB/s: 1191
Read speed, 16 KB blocks, MB/s: 1194
Read speed, 32 KB blocks, MB/s: 1125
Read speed, 64 KB blocks, MB/s: 320
Read speed, 128 KB blocks, MB/s: 310
Read speed, 256 KB blocks, MB/s: 283
Read speed, 512 KB blocks, MB/s: 269
Read speed, 1024 KB blocks, MB/s: 250
Read speed, 2048 KB blocks, MB/s: 237
Write speed, 4 KB blocks, MB/s: 1185
Write speed, 32 KB blocks, MB/s: 1090
Write speed, 256 KB blocks, MB/s: 167
Write speed, 2048 KB blocks, MB/s: 104
Copy speed, 4 KB blocks, MB/s: 840
Copy speed, 32 KB blocks, MB/s: 114
Copy speed, 256 KB blocks, MB/s: 84
Copy speed, 2048 KB blocks, MB/s: 60
Disk Details
Disk Last Scanned: 00:00:00
Disk Last Optimized: 98-10-11 16:58:00
Cached Disk, 128 blocks
Open file time (s): 0,0017
Sequential write time (s): 0,01
Sequential read time (s): 0,071
Random write time (s): 0,0019
Random read time (s): 0,0079
Close file time (s): 0,0011
Open file bytes: 1024
Sequential write bytes: 524288
Sequential read bytes: 4194304
Random write bytes: 65536
Random read bytes: 262144
Close file bytes: 1024
Open file MB/s: 0,57
Sequential write MB/s: 48
Sequential read MB/s: 56
Random write MB/s: 32
Random read MB/s: 31
Close file MB/s: 0,87
Uncached Disk, 2048 blocks
Open file time (s): 0,0017
Sequential write time (s): 1,8
Sequential read time (s): 1,3
Random write time (s): 3,2
Random read time (s): 3,4
Close file time (s): 0,0078
Open file bytes: 1024
Sequential write bytes: 8388608
Sequential read bytes: 8388608
Random write bytes: 1048576
Random read bytes: 1048576
Close file bytes: 1024
Open file MB/s: 0,57
Sequential write MB/s: 4,6
Sequential read MB/s: 6,3
Random write MB/s: 0,31
Random read MB/s: 0,29
Close file MB/s: 0,13
Pozdrawiam i dzieki za wyniki moze by tak ktos z Celeronem z cachem by sie
odezwal
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue 18 May 2004 - 17:44:29 MET DST