"zlotowinfo" <usuntousun_at_go2.pl> wrote in message
news:jtq4tt$noh$1_at_inews.gazeta.pl...
> Użytkownik "rs" <no.address_at_no.spam.pl> napisał w wiadomości
> news:lq21089d9kkl0ei4up8pbhsnubm886fl80_at_4ax.com...
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 22:29:33 +0200, "zlotowinfo" <usuntousun_at_go2.pl>
> wrote:
>>> biorąc to pod uwagę apeluję o ponowne przemyślenie
>>> czy faktycznie ten 64bitowy system ma sens
>>> przy nadal wielu aplikacjach 32bitowych
>> ale do kogo apelujesz. jak widzisz, wiekszosc z nas juz to
>> przemyslala. czy ty, przypadkiem, nie chcesz nas tutaj nawracac? <rs>
> przy 4GB ja mam nadal wątpliwości
http://www.kudzuworld.com/blogs/Tech/20080801.en.aspx
Finally we arrive at the answer to my initial curiosity. Does x64 use more
memory (as opposed to just being able to use more memory) that x86? Is my
hypothesis correct? The answer is yes!
Immediately after installation I started task manager and then let it run for an
extended period to make sure each system was settled down. I even took the
measurements before checking for disk space so as to avoid launching any new
processes.
a.. Windows Server 2008 x86: 269 MB
b.. Windows Server 2008 x64: 346 MB
Difference: 77 MB
Take a look at the Kernel memory usage:
a.. Windows Server 2008 x86: 55 MB
b.. Windows Server 2008 x64: 111 MB
Difference: 56 MB
Received on Sat 14 Jul 2012 - 14:15:02 MET DST
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat 14 Jul 2012 - 14:42:00 MET DST