Re: Pro Futuro w Katowicach - jak sobie obecnie radzą?

Autor: Rafal.Doroszkiewicz <ja_at_vast.net.pl>
Data: Sun 30 Oct 2005 - 10:42:18 MET
Message-ID: <dk24jr$1ig1$1@node3.news.atman.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed

Przemyslaw Frasunek napisał(a):
> Mateusz Swatek <mateo@ip24.pl> wrote:
>
>>IMHO b. dobry wynik
>
>
> ;)
>
> Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> 1. do-srv.atman.pl 0.0% 2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0
> 2. rev-85.232.232.1.atman.pl 0.0% 2 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.3
> 3. z-atman.tpnet.pl 0.0% 2 0.8 30.4 0.8 60.0 41.9
> 4. do.war-ar8.z.war-r4.tpnet.pl 0.0% 2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.0
> 5. z.war-ar8.do.war-ar9.tpnet.pl 0.0% 2 2.3 2.0 1.8 2.3 0.4
> 6. gaja.tpnet.pl 0.0% 2 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.5 0.3

Tylko dla równowagi:

HOST: vast Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst
   1. do-atman.vast.net.pl 0.0% 1 21.3 21.3 21.3 21.3
   2. rev-85.232.232.1.atman.pl 0.0% 1 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7
   3. z-atman.tpnet.pl 0.0% 1 29.2 29.2 29.2 29.2
   4. do.war-ar8.z.war-r4.tpnet.pl 0.0% 1 19.5 19.5 19.5 19.5
   5. z.war-ar8.do.war-ar9.tpnet.p 0.0% 1 19.6 19.6 19.6 19.6
   6. gaja.tpnet.pl 0.0% 1 14.4 14.4 14.4 14.4

;)

Pozdrawiam,
Received on Sun Oct 30 10:45:12 2005

To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun 30 Oct 2005 - 11:40:02 MET