Autor: Maciej Machacz (xenes_at_interia.pl)
Data: Sun 14 Sep 2003 - 13:49:23 MET DST
Użytkownik "Marcin Szczygielski" <marcs_at_poczta.onet.pl> napisał w wiadomości
news:bjsqu0$9va$1_at_news.onet.pl...
> prosze bardzo(tylko nie trójmiasto a Lublin) lublin 1Mbit
> Pinging www.onet.pl [213.180.130.200] with 32 bytes of data:
> Reply from 213.180.130.200: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=247
> Reply from 213.180.130.200: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=247
> Reply from 213.180.130.200: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=247
> Reply from 213.180.130.200: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=247
> Ping statistics for 213.180.130.200:
> Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
> Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
> Minimum = 18ms, Maximum = 19ms, Average = 18m
> Pinging www.wp.pl [212.77.100.101] with 32 bytes of data:
> Reply from 212.77.100.101: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=119
> Reply from 212.77.100.101: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=119
> Reply from 212.77.100.101: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=119
> Reply from 212.77.100.101: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=119
> Ping statistics for 212.77.100.101:
> Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
> Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
> Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 23ms
A czy ktos przy iDSL 512kbit schodzi ponizej 50ms do routera brzegowego ?
-- -- Maciej Machacz | mailto:xenes_at_interia.pl ICQ:54914949 | GG:17979
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed 19 May 2004 - 18:07:40 MET DST