Re: Internet w IPartners

Autor: Jarek Druzd (raven_at_irc.pl)
Data: Wed 27 Nov 2002 - 17:01:28 MET


On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Dariusz Jackowski wrote:

>[...]

Moze po 20 chodzi to OK, ale np. o 14:00 podczas godzin "roboczych",
jest duuzo gorzej:

traceroute: Warning: www.tpnet.pl has multiple addresses; using 217.98.20.14
traceroute to www.tpnet.pl (217.98.20.14), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1 157.25.5.193 (157.25.5.193) 1.761 ms 6.237 ms 1.657 ms
 2 217.153.3.149 (217.153.3.149) 7.776 ms 9.906 ms 9.824 ms
 3 kaga2-f0-0-220 (217.153.3.10) 7.953 ms 9.885 ms 1.237 ms
 4 194.204.132.233 (194.204.132.233) 95.261 ms 90.368 ms 87.146 ms
 5 z.war-r2.do.war-r1.tpnet.pl (194.204.175.101) 96.752 ms 98.957 ms 98.181 ms
 6 do.war-ar8.z.war-r2.tpnet.pl (213.25.5.46) 102.170 ms 100.579 ms 120.771 ms
 7 fama.tpnet.pl (217.98.20.14) 102.619 ms 94.565 ms 98.011 ms

traceroute to rubin.futuro.pl (62.233.128.10), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1 157.25.5.193 (157.25.5.193) 3.382 ms 3.719 ms 9.910 ms
 2 217.153.3.149 (217.153.3.149) 9.768 ms 9.901 ms 2.619 ms
 3 kaga2-f0-0-220 (217.153.3.10) 1.255 ms 2.275 ms 2.338 ms
 4 194.204.132.233 (194.204.132.233) 107.283 ms 103.412 ms 110.019 ms
 5 do.war-ar3.z.war-r1.tpnet.pl (195.205.0.14) 109.893 ms 123.917 ms 114.076 ms
 6 194.204.130.250 (194.204.130.250) 116.583 ms 113.605 ms 106.227 ms
 7 atm4-0-0-902-waw-br2-waw-br1.devs.futuro.pl (62.233.138.30) 104.945 ms 105.863 ms 118.402 ms
 8 atm3-2-301-waw-br1-waw-cr1.devs.futuro.pl (62.233.138.2) 115.397 ms 118.669 ms 114.995 ms
 9 * * *

traceroute to kujawiak.man.lodz.pl (212.51.192.18), 30 hops max, 40
byte packets
 1 157.25.5.193 (157.25.5.193) 2.593 ms 4.663 ms 1.070 ms
 2 217.153.3.149 (217.153.3.149) 6.702 ms 9.892 ms 9.823 ms
 3 kaga2-f0-0-220 (217.153.3.10) 9.681 ms 12.968 ms 9.820 ms
 4 195.94.199.62 (195.94.199.62) 194.002 ms 175.350 ms 165.474 ms
 5 z-lodz-gw.e-gw.man.lodz.pl (212.191.225.2) 143.084 ms 184.350 ms 211.079 ms

Wnioski: maja zapchne wyjscie do POLPAK'u i bardzo zapchane do POL34.
Polaczenia do operatorow np. TDC/ATMAN chodza przez NASK, i dziala to
OK, ale gdyby poszly przez POLPAK/POL34 nie bylo by juz tak ladnie.

--j.



To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed 19 May 2004 - 18:03:18 MET DST