Autor: Marcin Jagodzinski (pisz_na_adres_z_reply_to_at_webcorp.com.pl)
Data: Mon 19 Feb 2001 - 21:36:11 MET
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 21:25:22 +0100, "Gwidon S. Naskrent"
<root_at_artemida.amu.edu.pl> wrote:
>IMO to była jak najbardziej zasłużona kara za trollowanie. A że troll
>ukarał się sam - no cóż, niezbadane są wyroki losu.
>
To nie był troll, przynajmniej wg. poniższej definicji (za Jargon File)
troll v.,n.
1. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a posting on Usenet
designed to attract predictable responses or flames; or, the post itself.
[...] The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and
flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do,
while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact
a deliberate troll. [...]
2. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1; regularly posts
specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a newsgroup, discussion
list, or in email for no other purpose than to annoy someone or disrupt a
discussion. Trolls are recognizable by the fact that the have no real
interest in learning about the topic at hand - they simply want to utter
flame bait. [...]
-- Marcin Jagodziński || http://portfolio.art.pl
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed 19 May 2004 - 16:44:21 MET DST