Autor: Rafal Maszkowski (rzm_at_dain.erlm.siemens.de)
Data: Tue 20 Dec 1994 - 22:59:01 MET
Jarek Lis (lis_at_asic.ict.pwr.wroc.pl) wrote:
> Cos takiego przeczytalem:
> : >> Can't imagine why you'd need a 'legal' IP address just for an SNMP
> : >> management station. If you're not going to be on the Internet this should
> : >> not be necessary...
> : >If you don't think you need it, you can pick IP addresses arbitrarily
> : >with the first octet being 10. That way, should your net ever get
> : >connected (intentionally or accidentally) to the Internet, you're
> : >safe.
> Zrozumialem, ze sieci 10.x.x.x sa do dowolnego lokalnego wykorzystania.
> Czy to prawda?
Tak. Rowniez 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 i 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255
> : And it would be wise to read both RFC1597 and RFC1627, which argue pro
> : and con for doing so. Just to be informed.
..co byc moze jest powiedziane wlasnie w tych RFC.
R.
-- Rafal Maszkowski rzm_at_oso.chalmers.se http://www.mat.uni.torun.pl/~rzm Opinia publiczna powinna byc zaalarmowana swoim nieistnieniem - St. J. Lec
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed 19 May 2004 - 15:47:27 MET DST