Re: VooDoo2 z Taiwanu

Autor: Lukasz 'DentarG' Jozwinski from Lublin (jozef_at_kki.net.pl)
Data: Tue 20 Oct 1998 - 19:49:50 MET DST


On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 21:05:10 +0200, "Gall Anonim" <avnet_at_zigzag.pl>
wrote:
>Przetestowałem toto na komputerze: iP MMX 225 MHz (3 x 75 MHz),
>64 MB dimm, Viper v330 PCI (hehe...), AWE 64 Value.

>Acha, v330 na sterownikach NVidia (rulez!), VooDoo2 na
>tych znalezionych w pudełku.
>
>
>Final Reality (Advanced Benchmark x 5):
>
>Database Entry <iP MMX 225 MHz + v330 + VooDoo2 12 MB>
>Benchmark results:
>Radial blur, 5A, 17.89, rips, 2.474, Rmark
>Chaos zoomer, 5A, 31.77, rips, 1.544, Rmark
>25 Pixel, 5A, 102.97, kpps, 3.291, Rmark
>Robots, 5A, 24.92, rips, 6.457, Rmark
>Fillrate, 5A, 21.86, MPps, 4.732, Rmark
>City scene, 5A, 33.84, rips, 8.397, Rmark
>Video card bus transfer, 5A, 42.11, MBps, 1.341, Rmark
>Direct3D bus transfer, 5A, 22.26, MBps, 1.902, Rmark
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Visual appearance, 100.00, percent
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Overall 3D, 2.882, Rmark
>Overall 2D, 2.009, Rmark
>Overall bus rate, 1.509, Rmark
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>OVERALL SCORE, 2.414, Rmark
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>3094059491
>
>Database Entry <iP MMX 225 MHz + v330>
>Benchmark results:
>Radial blur, 5A, 17.77, rips, 2.458, Rmark
>Chaos zoomer, 5A, 31.70, rips, 1.540, Rmark
>25 Pixel, 5A, 89.71, kpps, 2.867, Rmark
>Robots, 5A, 21.91, rips, 5.676, Rmark
>Fillrate, 5A, 22.13, MPps, 4.791, Rmark
>City scene, 5A, 29.20, rips, 7.245, Rmark
>Video card bus transfer, 5A, 42.33, MBps, 1.348, Rmark
>Direct3D bus transfer, 5A, 13.12, MBps, 1.122, Rmark
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Visual appearance, 100.00, percent
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Overall 3D, 2.719, Rmark
>Overall 2D, 1.999, Rmark
>Overall bus rate, 1.280, Rmark
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>OVERALL SCORE, 2.287, Rmark
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>3595146925
>
>
>Prawdopodobnie mam trochę za cienki komputer do tego rodzaju
>testów, ale mam nadzieję, że da się coś z nich wywnioskować...
>
>Na przykład to, że różnica jest całkiem niewielka.

Tak ogladam te wyniki i wydaja mi sie jakies dziwne ....
albo nie zabardzo umiesz obslugiwac FR, albo Twoj komp jest jakis lewy
...

Bo na moim p233 mmx z magistrala 66, czyli caly system jest
wolniejszy, 64 mb Edo ramu, i Monster 3D jeden !!!!!!
mam w FR takie wyniki .....

Database Entry <233mmx + dm3d 57>

Benchmark results:
Radial blur, 5A, 19.79, rips, 2.737, Rmark
Chaos zoomer, 5A, 35.89, rips, 1.744, Rmark
25 Pixel, 5A, 81.27, kpps, 2.597, Rmark
Robots, 5A, 25.50, rips, 6.605, Rmark
Fillrate, 5A, 19.82, MPps, 4.290, Rmark
City scene, 5A, 34.92, rips, 8.665, Rmark
Video card bus transfer, 5A, 51.62, MBps, 1.643, Rmark
Direct3D bus transfer, 5A, 17.36, MBps, 1.484, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visual appearance, 100.00, percent
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall 3D, 2.862, Rmark
Overall 2D, 2.241, Rmark
Overall bus rate, 1.595, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERALL SCORE, 2.486, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1694408031

Czyli lepiej niz na Twoim Voodoo2 z magistrala 75 mhz ...

Na niefirmowej karcie 3dfx 1 wyniki sa takie :

Database Entry <233mmx + 3dfx1>

Benchmark results:
Radial blur, 5A, 19.46, rips, 2.691, Rmark
Chaos zoomer, 5A, 33.19, rips, 1.613, Rmark
25 Pixel, 5A, 80.37, kpps, 2.569, Rmark
Robots, 5A, 23.99, rips, 6.216, Rmark
Fillrate, 5A, 8.99, MPps, 1.947, Rmark
City scene, 5A, 31.94, rips, 7.925, Rmark
Video card bus transfer, 5A, 42.03, MBps, 1.338, Rmark
Direct3D bus transfer, 5A, 15.68, MBps, 1.340, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visual appearance, 100.00, percent
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall 3D, 2.657, Rmark
Overall 2D, 2.152, Rmark
Overall bus rate, 1.339, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERALL SCORE, 2.308, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1870381255

Czyli minimalnie mniejsze ....
Nie wiem, moze testowales z dzwiekiem,
a moze testowales 2 razy Rive ???

Ale na Rivie tez powinienes miec wyzsze wyniki ...
na pewno na obu kartach powyzej 3.000,
a na 12 MB voodoo2 nawet moze i 3.400 ....

Dziwne ....
A jesli te wyniki sa prawdziwe to znaczy ze te karty sa cienkie, bo
monster 2 8 MB na p225 mmx spokojnie ponad 3.3 w FR ......
Wiem ze Voodoo 2 lepiej dziala z silnym geomery setupem ze strony
procka .. czyli z jakims p2 lub k6 3Dnow ... ale zeby az taki cienko,
to nie wierze .....
Dziwne ....

pzdr,
Dentarg

--
          e-mail:jozef_at_kki.net.pl - from Lublin
  Quake 1 page - http://hipokrates.am.lublin.pl/quake/
Warcraft II page - http://hipokrates.am.lublin.pl/war2/
    Dentarg in Quake & Starcraft | UIN: 15071179


To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue 18 May 2004 - 17:44:17 MET DST