Autor: Andrzej Kasperowicz (A.Kasperowicz_at_plymouth.ac.uk)
Data: Fri 18 Oct 1996 - 18:40:56 MET DST
Drodzy Chemfani!
Ponizszy tekst zapewne bardziej nadawalby sie na liste medyczna, ale
poniewaz z pewnoscia dotyczy on wielu z nas (mam na mysli
amalgamatowe wypelnienia, chociaz akurat w tym konkretnym liscie
poruszany jest problem uranu), pozwole sobie go tu zacytowac i zachecam
do odwiedzenia dwoch podanych w tekscie URLi - informacji i
odnosnikow bedzie tam bardzo duzo, ale wystarczy przeczytac tylko
fragmenty, zeby.....
AK
Quoted an interesting extract below, something to think about.. I havent verified this one, it needs more checking out, but I wouldnt put it past em..
I do know that dentists have in the past used Cadmium in fillings, Asbestos for dressings, and of course Mercury is still used in Amalgam - about 1/2 gram per filling (thats a lot!). Those ARE hard facts.
Bosses site (below) lists even more fantastic chemicals that have found
their way into teeth-fillings..
If anyone knows more about the Uranium story, I'd be interested to hear..
Certain you've got to ask yourself - if Dentists have used Asbestos & Cadmium in your mouth, how can you believe them when they tell you that the Mercury (#1 most toxic non-radioactive subtsance known to science) in your fillings is safe?
cheers
adrian
Visit my UK amalgam homepage at:-
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/pcsol
This provides a wide range of information, and also links to
other important sources - The Amalgam FAQ, The BBC Panorama
program summary, the IAOMT homepage, Bosses page, Dr Edelson Environmental
medicine homepage, etc..
-----------------------------------EXTRACT FROM AMALGAM LIST--------
Linda Javins wrote:
>In a syndicated column, The Straight Dope, Cecil Adams says that uranium used
>to be put in crowns and false teeth to make them look bright! The process was
>patented in 1942 in the U.S. and was used a little in the U.S. and Germany.
>The process lost favor in the 70's and the U.S. government revoked permission
>to use it in the mid-80's because of safety concerns. Cecil says that most
>dental porcelain sold today is uranium-free. He also says: <quote> What's the
>safest dental material? One guess: real teeth... brush 'em after every meal,
>because who knows what the dental industry will think up next? <unquote>
>
>P.S. I saw this column in the Washington, DC City Paper, October 4 edition.
>They say that if you have America Online, you can visit the Straight Dope
>area. And you can send e-mail to the column through
>ezotti_at_merle.acns.nwu.edu.
If you are interested in what has been put into people's teeth for the last 30 years, take a look into Ulf Bengtsson's research into all documented materials. Still believe the dentists know what they are doing? You find the article at
http://vest.gu.se/~bosse/yb_UBendoSumm.html
It is a very thorough investigation. Take a look at the summary, and look into the case of N 2.
Cheers
Bosse
PS. The whole site will be completely redone during the autumn and winter.
e-mail: bosse_at_vest.gu.se
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Thu 08 May 2003 - 14:23:04 MET DST